Camargo

Camargo v. Triumph Motorcycles CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 2014H039172California3,356 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grover, J.

Filed 6/27/14 Camargo v. Triumph Motorcycles CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

PABLO A. CAMARGO, H039172

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 110CV182797)

v.

TRIUMPH MOTORCYCLES

(AMERICA) LTD.,

Defendant and Respondent.

The Supreme Court has repeatedly confirmed that “[t]he ‘ “experienced trial judge is the best judge of the value of professional services rendered in [] court, and while [that] judgment is of course subject to review, it will not be disturbed unless the appellate court is convinced that it is clearly wrong.” ’ ” (Ketchum v. Moses (2001) 24 Cal.4th 1122, 1132 (Ketchum), quoting Serrano v. Priest (1977) 20 Cal.3d 25, 49 (Serrano III).) In this appeal, plaintiff Pablo A.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.