Jarlos

Jarlos v. Talens CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 2014A140418California1,124 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/27/14 Jarlos v. Talens CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

KATHERINE LOUISE ENRIQUEZ

JARLOS,

A140418

Respondent, (San Mateo County v. Super. Ct. No. FAM0122258)

CARLO PANGILINAN TALENS,

Appellant. _______________________________________/

The trial court issued a one-year restraining order protecting Katherine Louise Enriquez Jarlos from Carlo Pangilinan Talens pursuant to the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (DVPA) (Fam. Code, § 6200 et seq.). Talens appeals, claiming insufficient evidence supports the order.1 We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

“We summarize the facts in the light most favorable to the judgment.” (Brekke v. Wills (2005) 125 Cal.App.4th 1400, 1405.) 1 All further statutory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.