Watkins

Watkins v. Anderson CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 27, 2014A139322California509 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/27/14 Watkins v. Anderson CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

GLORIA WATKINS,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A139322

v. TINA ANDERSON et al., (Solano County Super. Ct. No. FCS040633) Defendants and Respondents.

BY THE COURT*:

Appellant Gloria Watkins filed a civil complaint against respondents Tina Anderson, Ella Broxton Henderson and Jennie E. Edney for alleged acts of assault, battery, intimidation, threats and coercion during the course of an ongoing labor dispute. The trial court granted respondents’ special motion to strike the complaint under Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16, the so-called anti-SLAPP statute, and issued a separate order awarding respondents $37,857.97 in attorney fees and costs as prevailing parties on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.