Assenzio

Assenzio v. Baillie CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 2014A139144California5,861 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

Filed 6/30/14 Assenzio v. Baillie CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THOMAS ASSENZIO,

Defendant and Appellant, v. A139144 AMY LYNNE BAILLIE et al., (Alameda County Plaintiffs and Respondents. Super. Ct. No. JCCP004688)

This is an appeal from a trial court order denying appellant Thomas Assenzio’s motion to compel arbitration and to stay the proceedings. This motion was brought in response to a lawsuit filed against appellant (and others) by respondents Amy Lynne Baillie and Kathrine Rosas based on the allegedly illegal lending practices of a number of corporations under appellant’s direct ownership, management or control. Appellant moved to compel arbitration and to stay the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.