People v. Grubb CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 2014E057441California1,352 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

Defendant’s oldest daughter, the victim of two counts of lewd and lascivious

conduct and the penetration charge, who was 22 at the time of trial, testified that when

she was under the age of 13, defendant got angry with her when she refused defendant’s

request to play with defendant’s sex toys (dildos and vibrators) with defendant and

defendant punished her by placing them in herself or in the oldest daughter’s mouth, or

by hitting the daughter, throwing things or telling her to leave. Defendant forced the

daughter to clean the dildos defendant used with cleanser or soap and hot water. Also

when the oldest daughter was under the age of 13, defendant would have her massage her

while defendant was naked, and defendant would moan in a sexual manner during such

All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated.

2 massages and tell the daughter to rub lower, meaning near defendant’s derriere. If the

daughter refused the latter, defendant would get angry and tell the daughter to get out or

defendant would hit her. During one such massage, defendant asked the daughter to

insert a sex toy in defendant’s vagina and when the daughter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.