In re B.T. CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 2014A139177California6,935 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

Filed 7/1/14 In re B.T. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

In re B.T., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

SAN FRANCISCO HUMAN SERVICES

AGENCY,

Plaintiff and Respondent, v. A139177, A139876 B.J., et al., (San Francisco County Defendants and Appellants. Super. Ct. No. JD113075)

Mother K.U. and father B.J. (collectively, parents) jointly appeal from the juvenile court’s orders to (1) deny their request for a bonding study, (2) deny their request for reconsideration of the prior order finding jurisdiction over minor B.T. pursuant to the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) (Fam.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.