JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Greenberg CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 2, 2014B246079California2,073 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Facts and Procedural History In 2001 Zohreh Khabushani (Zohreh) acquired title to the Thousand Oaks property based on a quitclaim deed from Paramount Group, Inc. (PGI) to Zohreh, "a married woman as her sole and separate property." In 2003, Chase's predecessor in interest, Washington Mutual Savings (WaMu), loaned Zohreh $265,000 and recorded a deed of trust on the property. On June 3, 2005, appellant obtained a $153,310.35 judgment against PGI and Zohreh's husband, Michael Khabushani, in Los Angeles County Superior Court. (Paramount Group, Inc. v. Greenberg, Los Angeles County Sup. Ct. Case No. BC-305818.) On September 7, 2005, appellant filed a creditor's action to enforce the judgment. (Greenberg v. Khabushani et al., Ventura County Sup. Ct. Case No. SC- 043980.) WaMu/Chase was not a defendant in the action. Appellant prevailed and recorded a June 30, 2008 judgment stating that Zohreh "is a third person who has property in which Defendants, Mike Khabushani and Paramount Group, Inc, have an interest. . ." In 2011, Chase sued for declaratory relief on the ground that the judgment lien was subordinate to Chase's deed of trust. The trial court found that the 2001…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.