Oscar Higueros v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
582 F. App'x 692
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 3, 201411-71380California278 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Oscar Humberto Higueros, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252 . We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Tapia Madrigal v. Holder, 716 F.3d 499, 503 (9th Cir.2013), and we grant the petition for review and remand.

In assessing Higueros’s fear of torture, the BIA acknowledged the evidence showed the existence of “rogue officials” in Guatemala, and found the existence of rogue officials “cannot be used” to demonstrate that government officials would acquiesce to any torture of Higueros. The BIA’s finding is not supported, see Tapia Madrigal, 716 F.3d at 509-10 (“[A]n application for CAT relief need not show that the entire foreign government would consent to or acquiesce in his torture. He need show only that ‘a public official’ would so acquiesce.”), and its analysis is otherwise not clear, see Recinos De Leon v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 1185, 1189 (9th Cir. 2005) (“When the agency’s reasoning is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.