Lee Quillar v. Herbert Exarhos
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 201413-55141California447 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 07 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LEE V. QUILLAR, No. 13-55141
Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:12-cv-03004-JAH-
MDD
V.
HERBERT J. EXARHOS, Superior Court MEMORANDUM* Judge; COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California John A. Houston, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 25, 2014**
Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Lee V. Quillar appeals pro se from the district
court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to pay the
required filing fee after denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.…