Lee Quillar v. Herbert Exarhos

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 201413-55141California447 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 07 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEE V. QUILLAR, No. 13-55141

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:12-cv-03004-JAH-

MDD

V.

HERBERT J. EXARHOS, Superior Court MEMORANDUM* Judge; COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California John A. Houston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 25, 2014**

Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Lee V. Quillar appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to pay the

required filing fee after denying his application to proceed in forma pauperis under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.