Charlene Gruntz V.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 201412-60014California338 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 07 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
In re: CHARLENE GRUNTZ, No. 12-60014
Debtor, BAP No. 11-1329
JOHN MARTIN; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Appellants,
v.
PATRICIA J. ZIMMERMAN, Chapter 7 Trustee; et al.,
Appellees.
Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Kirscher, Dunn, and Markell, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding
Submitted June 25, 2014**
Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
John Martin and other appellants collectively appeal pro se from the
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment dismissing, for failure to
prosecute, their appeal from the bankruptcy court’s remand order. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review for an abuse of discretion,