Charlene Gruntz V.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 7, 201412-60014California338 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 07 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: CHARLENE GRUNTZ, No. 12-60014

Debtor, BAP No. 11-1329

JOHN MARTIN; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Appellants,

v.

PATRICIA J. ZIMMERMAN, Chapter 7 Trustee; et al.,

Appellees.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Kirscher, Dunn, and Markell, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted June 25, 2014**

Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

John Martin and other appellants collectively appeal pro se from the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) judgment dismissing, for failure to

prosecute, their appeal from the bankruptcy court’s remand order. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review for an abuse of discretion,

Morrissey v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.