People v. Lupovitz CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
FACTS
The facts of the underlying case are not relevant to our resolution of the issue
defendant raises in this appeal. In any event, they are set out at length and in great detail
in the parties’ respective briefs. For our purpose, it is sufficient to note that defendant
was a co-owner of Elite Entertainment (Elite), an escort service with offices in various
locations, including Palm Springs. Women who worked for Elite signed contracts that
said it was illegal for them to engage in sex acts with customers. Secretaries who
answered calls for Elite’s services were directed to tell callers that Elite provided exotic
dancers and nude body rubs. A dancer sent out on a call collected a $200 show fee for an
hour of time. That fee belonged to Elite. The dancer’s compensation consisted of tips
negotiated with the customer.
Suspecting Elite operated as a cover for prostitution, an investigator with the
Riverside County Sheriff’s Department initiated a sting operation in which undercover
police officers posed as clients. The officers conducted between eight and 10 operations
in which they called Elite, asked for a girl to be sent to a hotel room, and when the girl