United States v. Edward J. Dillon, Petition of Manley B. Strayer

Good Law
346 F.2d 633
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 27, 196519629California3,274 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jertberg, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, directing the United States to pay fees and expenses of counsel appointed by the court to represent a prisoner in connection with proceedings under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 . The opinion of the district court, Dillon v. United States, is reported at 230 F.Supp. 487 .

The jurisdiction of the district court to enter such a judgment against the United States was asserted under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 . The jurisdiction of this Court over the present appeal rests on 28 U.S.C. § 1291 .

The facts are not in dispute. The following summary is taken from appellant’s brief, to which appellee takes no issue.

In a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 , Edward J. Dillon sought to set aside a sentence of 18 years for armed bank robbery. This sentence had been imposed after Dillon had pleaded guilty. Dillon alleged that the plea was induced by a false promise of a lenient sentence. The district court held a hearing on the petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and denied the relief requested. During the course of this hearing, Dillon made a request for counsel, which was denied. See Dillon v. United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.