Save Atascadero v. City of Atascadero CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 8, 2014B250126California3,937 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/8/14 Save Atascadero v. City of Atascadero CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

SAVE ATASCADERO, 2d Civil No. B250126 (Super. Ct. No. CV128230) Plaintiff and Appellant, (San Luis Obispo County)

v.

CITY OF ATASCADERO,

Defendant and Respondent.

Save Atascadero (Save) appeals a judgment denying its petition for writ of mandate. Save challenges the City of Atascadero's (the City's) decision to approve the Del Rio Commercial Area Specific Plan. Save contends the City did not proceed in the manner required by law because its environmental impact report (EIR): (1) did not timely disclose modeling data for an agency's screening analysis of "Type B" health…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.