Hill

Hill v. Appeals Bd. City of San Jose CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 9, 2014H038406California3,517 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grover, J.

Filed 7/9/14 Hill v. Appeals Bd. City of San Jose CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

JAMES C. HILL as Trustee, etc. et al., H038406 (Santa Clara County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. 1-11-CV200857)

v.

THE APPEALS HEARING BOARD OF

THE CITY OF SAN JOSE et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

By petition for writ of administrative mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5), appellants James C. Hill et al. challenged Resolution 11-05 of Respondent Appeals Hearing Board of the City of San Jose (Board), which declared a two-sided billboard owned by appellants a public nuisance, ordered appellants to cease their operation of the billboard, and imposed a $100,000 administrative penalty.1 On appeal, appellants contend that the trial court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.