People v. Dunlap CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 9, 2014C073437California3,526 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/9/14 P. v. Dunlap CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent, C073437

v. (Super. Ct. Nos. 01F6562, 00F3309)

WILLIAM GEORGE DUNLAP,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant William George Dunlap was convicted by a jury of manufacturing methamphetamine and found by the trial court to have violated probation. He contends: (1) “The court’s refusal to dismiss [defendant’s] 47-year-old prior strike was error, as it resulted in an unusually harsh and unconstitutional 18-year sentence on a 65-year-old man”; and (2) the court’s imposition of certain fines and penalties violated the prohibition against ex post facto punishment. The Attorney General concedes the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.