Eid

People v. Eid

Good Law
174 Cal. Rptr. 3d 82·2014 Cal. LEXIS 4754·59 Cal. 4th 650·328 P.3d 69
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 10, 2014S211702California4,145 words

Opinion

Opinion

Liu, J.

Defendants were charged with kidnapping for ransom, which is punishable by life in prison. The jury instead convicted each of them of two lesser included offenses — felony attempted extortion and misdemeanor false imprisonment — which resulted in a sentence of four and a half years in custody. The Court of Appeal held that each defendant could be convicted of only one lesser included offense and struck the convictions for misdemeanor false imprisonment, thus reducing each defendant’s sentence to two and a half years. As explained below, defendants were properly convicted of both lesser included offenses. Accordingly, we reverse the Court of Appeal.

I.

Defendants Reynaldo Junior Bid and Alaor Docarmo Oliveira were convicted in previous proceedings of kidnapping for ransom, but their convictions were reversed for instructional error. (People v. Eid (2010) 187 Cal.App.4th 859 [ 114 Cal.Rptr.3d 520 ]; People v. Oliveira (Aug. 19, 2010, G042004) [nonpub. opn.].) Defendants were then charged in an amended information in the present case with two counts of kidnapping for ransom of Ana and logo Ribeiro. (Pen. Code, § 209, subd. (a); all undesignated statutory references are to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.