People v. Taylor CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 10, 2014B249676California4,510 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mosk, J.

INTRODUCTION

Defendant and appellant Larron L. Taylor (defendant) was convicted of burglary (Pen. Code, § 4591) and attempted burglary (§§ 459 and 664). On appeal, defendant contends that he did not waive his federal and state constitutional rights to a jury trial in a bifurcated proceeding on the allegations of his prior prison terms, and therefore he is entitled to a jury trial on them; and the abstract of judgment should be corrected to reflect his entitlement to additional days of custody credit and that his presentence custody credits were calculated pursuant to section 4019. The Attorney General contends that the abstract of judgment should be amended to reflect that a criminal conviction assessment and a security fee was imposed on defendant for each of his two convictions. We order that defendant’s abstract of judgment be corrected to provide that he is entitled to additional presentence custody credits calculated pursuant to section 4019; and that a criminal conviction assessment and a security fee was imposed on defendant for each of his two convictions. We otherwise affirm the judgment.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND2

The District Attorney of Los Angeles County filed an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.