Curtin

Curtin v. Keenan CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 11, 2014D064135California6,967 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/10/14 Curtin v. Keenan CA4/1 Received for posting 7/11/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS L. CURTIN, D064135

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent,

BETTY M. RULE, as Administrator, etc., (Super. Ct. No. 37-2010-00060162-

CU-BC-NC)

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JAMES W. KEENAN et al.,

Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County,

Timothy M. Casserly, Judge. Reversed with directions.

McKenna, Long & Aldridge, Charles A. Bird and Aaron T. Winn for Defendants,

Cross-complainants and Appellants.

Testa & Associates, James A. Testa and Deborah A. Ries for Plaintiff, Cross-

defendant and Respondent Thomas L. Curtin. Douglas L.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.