People v. Ramirez CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 11, 2014B252506California526 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/11/14 P. v. Ramirez CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE, B252506

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NA026733) v.

ARMANDO RAMIREZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

THE COURT:*

Defendant Armando Ramirez aka Jose Blanco appeals from the order denying his ex parte motion for resentencing. Defendant is currently serving a sentence of 35 years to life, imposed in 1998. Defendant filed a notice of appeal indicating the appeal was based on the superior court’s refusal to resentence him pursuant to Proposition 36. We appointed counsel to represent defendant on this appeal. After examination of the record, counsel filed an “Opening Brief” containing an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.