Mauctrst, LLC v. Traux CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 11, 2014C069486California4,902 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/11/14 Mauctrst, LLC v. Traux CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(San Joaquin)

MAUCTRST, LLC, et al., C069486

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. 39-2010- 00253617-CU-PN-STK) v.

DANIEL TRAUX et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

Plaintiffs Richard C. Sinclair (Sinclair),1 Brandon Sinclair (Brandon), Gregory Mauchley, Mauctrst, LLC (Mauctrst), Capstone, LLC, and Lairtrust, LLC (Lairtrust) sued their former attorneys Daniel Truax and Lisa Blanco Jimenez and the law firm Neumiller & Beardslee (sometimes collectively referred to herein as Neumiller) for professional malpractice arising from Neumiller’s representation of plaintiffs in an underlying real estate action. In the real estate action the trial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.