Maria Flores v. County of Los Angeles

Good Law
758 F.3d 1154·2014 WL 3397219·2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13318
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 201412-56623California3,215 words

Opinion

Opinion

Bea, J.

Plaintiff Maria Flores alleges that after she received a traffic ticket, she drove to a Los Angeles County vehicle inspection site to clear the ticket. There, she alleges, she was sexually assaulted by a deputy sheriff, who is to date unidentified. She now sues the County and its sheriff Lee Baca, claiming the assault was a proximate result of their failure properly to train deputy sheriffs “to ensure that Sheriffs [djeputies do not sexually assault women that [deputies come in contact with.” This failure to train is alleged to be a violation of plaintiffs constitutional rights, actionable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . The district court dismissed Flores’s claims for failure to state a claim for relief, and she appeals.

Flores’s allegations do not establish that the County or Baca were deliberately indifferent to the risk of sexual assault by deputies on members of the public, nor that the assault on Flores was a known or obvious consequence of the alleged lack of training of deputies. Further, in view of the penal code of California, which already prohibited such assault, and which law the deputies were sworn to uphold, and in the absence of any pattern of sexual assaults by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.