Medifast, Inc. v. Barry Minkow

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 201411-55687California1,031 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 14 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MEDIFAST, INC., a Delaware corporation No. 11-55687 and SHIRLEY MACDONALD, as personal representative of Bradley D.C. No. 3:10-cv-00382-JLS-BGS MacDonald,

Plaintiffs - Appellants, AMENDED MEMORANDUM*

v.

BARRY MINKOW, an individual; et al.,

Defendants - Appellees.

MEDIFAST, INC., a Delaware corporation No. 11-55699 and SHIRLEY MACDONALD, as personal representative of Bradley D.C. No. 3:10-cv-00382-JLS-BGS MacDonald,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

BARRY MINKOW, an individual; et al.,

Defendants,

And

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ROBERT L. FITZPATRICK, an individual,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Janis L. Sammartino, District Judge, Presiding

Argued March 5, 2013** Submitted March 31, 2014 Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ and WATFORD, Circuit Judges, and KENNELLY,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.