Meza

Meza v. Bailey CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 14, 2014B250442California840 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/14/14 Meza v. Bailey CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

EVELYN JOSEPHINE MEZA, B250442

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. MS009426) v.

ALPHONSO BAILEY,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Carlos P. Baker, Judge. Affirmed.

Alphonso Bailey, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Respondent.

________________________________ Alphonso Bailey appeals from a civil harassment order entered against him. Bailey contends there was insufficient evidence to support the issuance of the order. The record does not include a reporter’s transcript or settled statement. We affirm the order. On June…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.