John R. Bayless v. United States

Good Law
347 F.2d 354·1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 5187
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 196519800California1,023 words

Opinion

Opinion

Barnes, J.

We have before us an appeal from an “order denying petition for modification and correction of an illegal sentence.” Appellant contends he is entitled to relief pursuant to Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure for a sentence imposed on the second count of a three-count indictment for bank robbery ( 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113 (a), (d)) and for transportation of stolen monies in interstate commerce ( 18 U.S.C. § 2314 ). A jury had found appellant guilty of all three counts at a trial conducted in 1952. Appellant’s present attack challenges the validity of separate sentences under Counts I and II of the indictment, and seeks to have vacated the sentence imposed on Count II, the longer of the two concurrent sentences.

Counts I and II of the indictment both involved violations of the Federal Bank Robbery Act. 18 U.S.C. § 2113 . Appellant was sentenced to twenty years under subsection (a), and was also sentenced to twenty-five years under subsection (d) for having placed the life of another in jeopardy by the use of a dangerous weapon during the course of his offense. Appellant received an additional sentence of ten years under Count III for transporting the stolen monies in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.