Hanley
Lee v. Hanley
Opinion
Opinion
Moore, J.
FACTS
In her second amended complaint, Lee alleged that the litigation Attorney Hanley had handled for her settled on January 25, 2010, the lawsuit was dismissed three days later, and Attorney Hanley did no further work on the matter thereafter. Attached to her second amended complaint were copies of a February 1, 2010 letter from Attorney Hanley to Lee and a February 1, 2010 invoice for legal services. The letter stated that Lee had a credit balance of $46,321.85 and the invoice so reflected. The invoice itemized work performed in January 2010, including the drafting of a settlement agreement and cover letter on January 18, 2010. Lee also alleged that in April 2010, she telephoned
3 Attorney Hanley and asked for a final billing statement and a return of her unused funds but that Attorney Hanley, in a harsh manner, told her she had no credit balance and would receive no refund. On December 6, 2010, Lee and Attorney Wilson each sent a letter to Attorney Hanley demanding the refund of $46,321.85 in unearned attorney fees plus approximately $10,000 in unused expert witness fees. By these letters, Lee terminated the services of Attorney Hanley and she and Attorney Wilson each…