People v. Hammett CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 15, 2014C075371California390 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/15/14 P. v. Hammett CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Butte) ----

THE PEOPLE, C075371

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. CM039426)

v.

JOSEPH EUGENE HAMMETT,

Defendant and Appellant.

On August 30, 2013, a Chico police officer observed defendant Joseph Eugene Hammett, whom the officer knew to be on parole. After conducting a parole search, the officer ran a records check which revealed that the bicycle in defendant’s possession had been reported stolen.

1 Because the matter was resolved by plea, our statement of facts is taken from the probation officer’s report.

1 Defendant pleaded guilty to receiving stolen property. (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a).) In exchange, a prior prison term…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.