Jun Cheng v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Good Law
583 F. App'x 655
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 15, 201410-73288California255 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jun Cheng, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals denial of asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(1), and deny the petition for review.

The agency’s adverse credibility finding is supported by several instances of Cheng’s significant inconsistent testimony regarding the events underlying her claim. Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034, 1046-47 (9th Cir.2010).

Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s alternative finding that, even if Cheng’s testimony were deemed to be credible, Cheng did not establish either past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution. Cheng’s single overnight detention and her husband’s rough treatment, after which they were released unharmed, did not rise to the level of persecution. Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 1019-21 (9th Cir.2006). Similarly, the agency’s finding that Cheng does not have an objective fear of future persecution on account of political opinion is supported by Cheng’s testimony that her similarly situated husband has remained in China without further detention or arrest. Hakeem v. INS, 273 F.3d 812, 816 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.