Police Retire. Sys of St Louis v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc.

Good Law
759 F.3d 1051·2014 WL 3451566·2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13530
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 16, 201412-16430California4,826 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKEOWN, J.

This case, involving robotic surgical devices, raises the question of how precise public statements of a company’s potential growth must be to comply with the anti-fraud protections of the securities laws. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (“Intuitive”) is a' corporation that designs, manufactures, and markets da Vinci Surgical Systems (“Systems”), cutting-edge robotic devices used for minimally invasive surgeries. The Police Retirement System of St. Louis (“PRS”) is a public pension fund that purchased shares of Intuitive stock.

PRS brought a class action suit against Intuitive on behalf of purchasers of Intuitive common stock, alleging violations of §§ 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Rule 10b-5. See 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78t(a); 17 C.F.R. § 240 .10b-5. PRS also named as defendants the following Intuitive executives (collectively, the “individual defendants”): Lonnie M. Smith, the CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors; Gary S. Guthart, the President and COO; Jerome J. McNamara, the Executive Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Marketing; Marshall L. Mohr, the Senior Vice President and CFO; Aleks Cukic,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.