People v. Robinson CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
BACKGROUND
Robinson knowingly and unlawfully had a bullet on her person.
DISCUSSION
Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the facts and proceedings
below. Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for
error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). Pursuant to Anders v.
California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders) counsel mentions as possible, but not arguable, issues:
(1) whether Robinson's plea was constitutionally valid; (2) whether the court complied with its
duty to establish a sufficient factual basis for the plea (Pen. Code, § 1192.5); (3) whether
Robinson was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement; and (4) whether the court
improperly denied Robinson's motion to suppress evidence.
We granted Robinson permission to file a brief on her own behalf. She has not responded.
A review of the record pursuant to Wende and Anders, including the possible issues listed
pursuant to Anders, has disclosed no reasonably arguable appellate issues. Robinson has been
competently represented by counsel on this appeal.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.