Brand

Brand v. Hyundai

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 16, 2014G048880MCalifornia4,536 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aronson, J.

Filed 7/16/14 Unmodified opinion attached

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ILAN BRAND,

G048880

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 30-2012-00541006) v.

ORDER DENYING REHEARING

HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA et al., AND MODIFYING OPINION; NO

CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

Defendants and Respondents.

Respondent’s rehearing petition is DENIED. The opinion filed June 17, 2014 is MODIFIED as follows:

On page 6, in the first new paragraph, in that paragraph’s last sentence ending “. . . whether there were other similar flaws in the sunroof wiring, or whether the problem might reoccur,” add a new footnote at the end of the sentence as follows: 1 Brand acknowledged in his testimony that a service technician told him “probably” on the day he attempted to rescind his purchase that the sunroof problem had been fixed. But of course that did not establish the problem had been fixed, nor that it was “easily fixable” as Hyundai now claims. Hyundai previously had told Brand several times the problem had been fixed. Renumber the ensuing footnote on page 12 as footnote number 2.

The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.