Bruzzone

BACKGROUND

On November 29, 2011, appellant filed a complaint against Intel. The complaint contained 11 causes of action: 1) “Breach of Corp. Fiduciary Duties and Malfeasance,” 2) “Corporate & Attorney Cover Up to Conceal Network Crime,” 3) “Witness Tampering to Disqualify Federal Reporter,” 4) “Constructed Fraud to Misprision Federal Reporter,” 5) “Constructed Fraud to Obstruct, Delay, Disrupt Administration of Justice,” 6) “Breach of Good Faith & Fair Dealing,” 7) “Placing into False Light,” 8) “Interference w/ Prospective Business Advantage,” 9) “Disclosure of Private Facts,” 10) “Attorney Violation Code of Professionalism Sect. 9 & 13d,” and 11) “Retaliation in Violation of California Public Policy.” Among the many allegations in the complaint, appellant asserted the following: Intel agents recruited appellant to work as an “industrial spy;” Intel employees engaged in a “construct[ive] fraud” in order to conceal appellant’s knowledge that “Intel is extensively infiltrated by organized crime network;” Intel agents confined appellant in an “11 foot by 11 foot space where handlers implement[ed] Staton DeGrandpre behavioral-pharmacological conditioning;” Intel agents sought to…