Robertson

Robertson v. Robertson CA2/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 17, 2014B246472California9,983 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/17/14 Robertson v. Robertson CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

DAVID ROBERTSON, B246472

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VC057513) v.

WILLIAM ROBERTSON et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Patrick

T. Meyers, Judge. Affirmed.

Stanley D. Bowman for Defendants and Appellants.

John Frank Davis for Plaintiff and Respondent.

******** Following a bench trial, the trial court entered judgment in favor of plaintiff and respondent David Robertson (David) and against defendants and appellants William Robertson (William) and Stanley Bowman (Bowman) (sometimes collectively appellants).1 David had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.