ARM

ARM v. Bruzzone CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 17, 2014H039438California1,045 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

On December 5, 2012, ARM, Inc. (hereafter “ARM”) filed a petition, pursuant to section 527.8, seeking a restraining order prohibiting appellant from engaging in the following conduct: harassing or intimidating five named ARM employees; engaging in violence or threats of violence against the named employees; following or stalking the named employees; contacting the named employees; and coming within 300 yards of the named employees or their workplace. The petition alleged that appellant was terminated from employment at ARM, that appellant “expressed frustration and anger at having been ‘blacklisted’ at ARM,” that appellant had engaged in “erratic” behavior and exhibited signs of “paranoia” in recent weeks, and that appellant made a “credible threat of violence” against ARM employees. On January 15, 2013, appellant filed a “Declaration of Mike Bruzzone in Opposition to Restraining Order as a Constructed Fraud by Certain ARM Employees for Continuation as Employment Blacklisting Device Conciously [sic] in Parrallel [sic] with Intel Corp. Cartel Crime Ring Sub Group.” In the declaration, appellant asserted that he was “being framed in a continuing Intel inter corporate sub…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.