Johnson v. JP Morgan Chase Bank CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 17, 2014B250227California2,596 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Filed 7/17/14 Johnson et al. v. JP Morgan Chase Bank CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

WES W. JOHNSON, KEN ERISMAN 2d Civil No. B250227 AND MARIE ERISMAN, (Super. Ct. No. CV100342) (San Luis Obispo County) Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK,

Defendant and Respondent.

Wes W. Johnson, Ken Erisman, and Marie Erisman appeal from the judgment entered after the trial court sustained, without leave to amend, a demurrer filed by JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., respondent. Appellants resided on property owned by Johnson. After Johnson defaulted on a loan secured by a deed of trust on the property, respondent bought the property at a trustee's sale and filed an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.