Verizon of California v. Carrick CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 17, 2014H038157California1,822 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/17/14 Verizon of California v. Carrick CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

VERIZON OF CALIFORNIA, INC., H038157

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. CV028324)

v.

PAUL CARRICK et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

This case concerns a private road that was condemned for a subterranean easement to install telephone cable. The Summit Road Association (SRA), is a group of people who maintain the private road with donations from and the efforts of its 140 landowner members. Judgment was entered in this case following a jury trial to determine just compensation. All of the the individual landowners whose property was affected by the condemnation have been fully compensated. However, the SRA appeals…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.