People v. Ingram CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
FACTS
In the information, the People alleged defendant was required to register as a sex
offender under section 290, and alleged he failed to inform the Moreno Valley Police
Department (MVPD), with whom he was registered, within five working days of moving
to a new address in another law enforcement agency’s jurisdiction. (§ 290.013,
subd. (a).) The People also alleged defendant suffered four prior strike convictions for
3 serious and violent felonies within the meaning of section 667, subdivisions (c) and
(e)(2)(A), and section 1170.12, subdivision (c)(2)(A), as follows: (1) on November 20,
1984, defendant suffered a conviction for one count of rape (§ 261, subd. (a)); (2) on
November 20, 1984, defendant suffered a conviction for one count of oral copulation
(§ 288a, subd. (d)); (3) on November 20, 1984, defendant suffered a conviction for a
second count of oral copulation (§ 288a, subd. (d)); and (4) on December 1, 1993,
defendant suffered a conviction for one count of oral copulation (§ 288, subd. (d)).
At trial, defendant stipulated he was required to register for life as a sex offender
based on a prior conviction, and stipulated he knew he was required to…