People v. Harper CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 18, 2014E059104California5,488 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/18/14 P. v. Harper CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E059104

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF098762)

JAMES MONROE HARPER, OPINION

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Becky Dugan, Judge.

Reversed.

Paul E. Zellerbach, District Attorney, and Emily R. Hanks, Deputy District

Attorney, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Stephen M. Hinkle, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and

Respondent.

This is an appeal by the People following the trial court’s order granting defendant

and respondent James Monroe Harper’s petition to recall…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.