United States v. Jose Liera-Morales

Good Law
759 F.3d 1105·2014 WL 3563356·2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 13989
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 201412-10548California2,807 words

Opinion

Opinion

McKEOWN, J.

Jose Antonio Liera-Morales appeals from the judgment following his jury convictions stemming from his participation in a scheme to kidnap for ransom Franklin Aguilar-Avila (“Aguilar”). Liera-Morales was part of a human-trafficking ring that contacted Aguilar’s mother, Sonia Avila, to demand payment for her son’s release. Under stressful and emotional circumstances, Avila spoke with the traffickers by telephone to arrange for the safe return of her son and then recounted that conversation to a government agent. That agent’s trial testimony about the telephone call is the focus of this appeal. We hold that the district court’s admission of the agent’s testimony recounting Avila’s description of the call did not violate the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment because the call was made primarily to address an ongoing emergency and the challenged statements were nontestimonial. We therefore affirm Liera-Morales’s convictions.

BACKGROUND

I. Factual Backgkound

In 2011, Liera-Morales unlawfully entered the United States with the assistance of a human-trafficking ring and later began working for the trafficking ring to pay off his remaining smuggling fee. As a part of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.