Son

Son v. Lee CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 21, 2014D063192California8,899 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mcdonald, J.

Filed 7/21/14 Son v. Lee CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

KYUNG HEE SON et al., D063192

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v. (Super. Ct. No. 37-2011-00055454-CU-FR-NC) MARK M. LEE et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Earl H.

Maas III, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of James E. Lund and Nathan Low for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Kaloogian & Fuselier, Lowell Robert Fuselier, David Hayek and David J. Hart for

Defendants and Respondents.

In 2009, defendant Mark Lee sold his florist business (Tri-City Florist) to plaintiff

Ivy Global Corporation, Inc. (IGC), a corporation formed by plaintiff Kyung Hee Son

(Son) to acquire and operate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.