Ganoe

Ganoe v. Metalclad Insulation Corp.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 21, 2014B248941California3,910 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

Filed 7/8/14 Modified and Certified for Publication 7/21/14 (order attached)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ROSE MARIE GANOE et al., B248941

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC449400) v.

METALCLAD INSULATION

CORPORATION,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County,

Emilie Elias, Judge. Reversed.

The Arkin Law Firm and Sharon J. Arkin; Farrise Firm and Simona A. Farrise

for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

McKenna, Long & Aldridge, Stephen M. Nichols, Farah S. Nicol,

Bradford J. DeJardin, David G. Arthur, Caren D. Dombrowski and J. Alan Warfield for

Defendant and Respondent.

_______________________________________ The plaintiffs Rose Marie Ganoe et al.1 appeal the trial court’s order granting

summary judgment in favor of the defendant Metalclad Insulation Corporation

(Metalclad). The decedent in this wrongful death action was diagnosed with

mesothelioma and sued multiple corporate defendants for exposing him to asbestos at

his workplace. Metalclad moved for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.