Joseph Wood, III v. Charles Ryan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 201414-16310California2,365 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

FOR PUBLICATION JUL 21 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSEPH RUDOLPH WOOD, III, No. 14-16310

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 2:14-cv-01447-NVW-

JFM

v. District of Arizona, Phoenix CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections; et al.,

ORDER

Defendants - Appellees.

Before: THOMAS, Circuit Judge and Capital Case Coordinator.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc.

Pursuant to the rules applicable to capital cases in which an execution date has been

scheduled, a deadline was established by which any judge could request a vote on

whether the panel’s July 19, 2014 opinion should be reheard en banc. A judge

requested a vote on whether to rehear the panel’s opinion en banc. A majority of

the non-recused active judges did not vote in favor of rehearing en banc. Judges

Graber, Murguia, and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this

case. The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.