People v. Fainkina CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 2014B251130California877 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

Filed 7/22/14 P. v. Fainkina CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

THE PEOPLE, B251130

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. GA085985) v.

NATALYA FAINKINA,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael D. Carter, Judge. Affirmed as modified.

Dee A. Hayashi, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

_______________________ During a parole search of Natalya Fainkina, police officers found stolen credit cards in her wallet. They also found a small plastic bag containing methamphetamine in her car. The People filed an information charging…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.