United States v. David Garrison
Opinion
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Defendant David James Garrison appeals his convictions by jury for health care fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1847 , and conspiracy to commit health care fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1349 . He also appeals his sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm.
There was sufficient evidence that Garrison knowingly and willfully defrauded Medicare. Garrison admitted that he saw copies of his patients’ Medicare cards. He filled out and signed ten Medicare “super-bills” for billing patient visits to Medicare. He was familiar with the Medicare requirements for power wheelchairs. And at least some of the prescriptions Garrison filled out for power wheelchairs identified the “Medicare Allowance” for each wheelchair component. Viewing this evidence in' the light most favorable to the government, a rational jury could have concluded that Garrison knew Medicare was the victim of his fraud. See United States v. Nevils, 598 F.3d 1158, 1161 (9th Cir.2010) (en banc).
The district court did not err by applying a two-level sentencing enhancement under § 3B1.3 of the Sentencing Guidelines for Garrison’s abuse of a position of trust. Whether a defendant occupies a position of trust is a…