Shirk

Shirk v. Builders Fence Supply CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 2014F066015California8,253 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gomes, J.

Filed 7/22/14 Shirk v. Builders Fence Supply CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

SAMUEL SHIRK, a Minor, etc.,

F066015

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 10-236232) v.

BUILDERS FENCE COMPANY, INC., OPINION Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Barry Hammer, Judge. (Retired Judge of the San Luis Obispo County Sup. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Fitzgerald & Lundberg, Ken M. Fitzgerald and Barbrae Lundberg, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith, Cary L. Wood, Jeffry A. Miller and Arezoo Jamshidi, for Defendant and Respondent. -ooOoo- Rebel Fence Company (Rebel), a licensed contractor, installed a fence and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.