Shirk
Shirk v. Builders Fence Supply CA5
Opinion
Opinion
Gomes, J.
Filed 7/22/14 Shirk v. Builders Fence Supply CA5
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
SAMUEL SHIRK, a Minor, etc.,
F066015
Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 10-236232) v.
BUILDERS FENCE COMPANY, INC., OPINION Defendant and Respondent.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Barry Hammer, Judge. (Retired Judge of the San Luis Obispo County Sup. Ct. assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, § 6 of the Cal. Const.) Fitzgerald & Lundberg, Ken M. Fitzgerald and Barbrae Lundberg, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith, Cary L. Wood, Jeffry A. Miller and Arezoo Jamshidi, for Defendant and Respondent. -ooOoo- Rebel Fence Company (Rebel), a licensed contractor, installed a fence and…