In re Dylan L. CA2/7

DISCUSSION

We appointed counsel to represent Dylan on appeal. After reviewing the record, counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues. On May 9, 2014 we advised Dylan that

In response to a request by appellate counsel, the superior court clerk advised that there is no minute order for the hearing on the petition and no reporter’s transcript.

2 he had 30 days to submit any contentions or issues he wished us to consider. On June 6, 2014 we received a typed supplemental brief in which he requested this court “to consider post-conviction rehab [sic] as a separate and equitable ground for the expunction of juvenile convictions . . . .” We have examined the record and are satisfied that Dylan’s attorney on appeal has fully complied with the responsibilities of counsel and there are no arguable issues. (See Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U.S. 259, 277-284 [120 S.Ct. 746, 145 L.Ed.2d 756]; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 118-119; People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441.) Dylan is statutorily ineligible to have his juvenile court records sealed because he suffered subsequent felony convictions and misdemeanor convictions involving moral turpitude. (See Welf. & Inst.…