Craig

Craig v. Superior Court CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 22, 2014B250309California1,594 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Filed 7/22/14 Craig v. Superior Court CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

JAMES DAVID CRAIG, 2d Crim. No. B250309 2nd Crim. No. B249252 Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. CR36454) (Ventura County) v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF VENTURA

COUNTY,

Respondent,

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA,

Real Party in Interest.

James David Craig seeks mandamus relief and purports to appeal from an order denying his post-judgment petition to recall a portion of a Three Strikes 55-year-to- life sentence imposed in 1995 after he was convicted of first degree residential burglary 1 (Pen. Code, § 459) and carrying a dagger (former § 12020, subd. (a), now § 21310). The petition to recall the sentence was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.