People v. Simmons CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 23, 2014D065309California399 words

Opinion

Opinion

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On May 31, 2013, Simmons presented two checks to a bank teller. The teller told

Simmons she would have to contact the account owner. Simmons waited while the teller

attempted to contact the account owner. The bank discovered the checks were fraudulent

and the teller called police. However, Simmons left the bank before police arrived.

Police apprehended Simmons at a bus stop near the bank. After first talking to

someone who pretended to be the account owner, police successfully contacted the actual

owner and found that the checks were fraudulent.

A computer forensic investigator from the District Attorney's office testified about

the pattern of calls and text messages from Simmons's phone to the number of the person

who impersonated the account owner to police.

2 Adrien Jayasinha, the owner of the account on which the fraudulent checks were

made, testified the checks were not authorized and Simmons was not authorized to use

his name.

Simmons testified the checks were mailed to him, and a person who impersonated

the owner told him to take the checks to the bank. He did not know the actual owner of

the account.

DISCUSSION

As we have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.