Halpern

Halpern v. Skukla CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 23, 2014A138722California4,497 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/23/14 Halpern v. Skukla CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

KEVIN HALPERN,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

A138722

v. ANU SHUKLA, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG09466814) Defendant and Respondent.

Plaintiff Kevin Halpern appeals a judgment1 dismissing with prejudice his complaint against defendant Anu Shukla following the entry of terminating sanctions for disregard of discovery orders. Given Halpern’s repeated disregard of the court’s orders, we find no abuse of discretion and shall affirm the judgment. Factual and Procedural Background In 2009, Halpern filed a complaint against Shukla alleging causes of action for breach of fiduciary duty, intentional misrepresentation, and fraud. The complaint alleges that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.