Robbins

Robbins v. Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 24, 2014B252797California618 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

Brooke Teal Robbins alleges as follows: Robbins is a resident and taxpayer of Santa Barbara County. Since 2009, she has continuously resided at 25 Conejo Road in Santa Barbara as a tenant of her parents. Her parents were the victims of fraud, elder abuse, predatory lending and wrongful foreclosure. The purchaser at the foreclosure sale successfully prosecuted an unlawful detainer action against her parents. Her parents have vacated the premises. Robbins was never served with a notice of trustee's sale; was not properly served with a 60-day notice prior to eviction; and was not named in the unlawful detainer action or writ of possession. Robbins alleges, on information and belief, that the Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Office through Sheriff Bill Brown, will "effectuate the writ of possession and writ of eviction regardless of the writ being improper" and of the "rights and remedies" of Robbins; the Sheriff and his office have "a policy and a custom of carrying out all court ordered Writs of Possessions and evictions without further investigation while using taxpayer funds"; and the Sheriff and his office "routine[ly] presume that all occupants have been properly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.