People v. Super. Ct. CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 24, 2014A142049California1,266 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pollak, J.

Filed 7/24/14 P. v. Super. Ct. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY A142049

AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO,

(City & County of San Francisco Respondent; Super. Ct. No. 221814)

JAMES PITRE,

Real Party in Interest.

The San Francisco District Attorney on behalf of the People petitions for a writ of mandate to set aside the trial court’s order dismissing one count of a four-count information against real party in interest James Pitre. At the conclusion of the preliminary hearing, the magistrate upheld the sufficiency of evidence to support counts charging Pitre with grand theft of personal property, receiving or buying stolen…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.